The annual congress of the Finnish Philatelic Federation was held on April 11, 2014 in Turku as part of the Aboex National Philatelic Exhibition. As Mr. Ari Muhonen had served the maximum six years a new President had to be elected. The new President is Mr. Klaus Juvas. Two new members of the board were also elected, namely Mr. Jussi Murtosaari and Mr. Marcus Olli.
Back row from left: Heikki Peltola, Tuomas Juvonen, Marcus Olli, Klaus Juvas (President). Front row from left: Jussi Murtosaari, Petteri Hannula (Vice President), Ilkka Salonen.
https://fepanews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Finland_Board_small_0.jpg615820Ari Muhonenhttps://fepanews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/fepanews_logo-107x138-1.pngAri Muhonen2014-05-29 13:16:062017-11-14 10:38:20New Board for the Finnish Federation
As Europe prepares to commemorate the centenary of the First World War, British and Belgian Philatelists, and their guests will gather in Ypres in Belgium from Friday 11th July till Monday 14th July for lectures and an exhibition of philatelic material from the War. The Roll of Distinguished Philately will also be signed in Ypres in the Cloth Hall. This year’s signatories are Robert Johnson FRPSL and Christopher King FRPSL, both from the United Kingdom, together with Wolfgang A. Maaßen FRPSL from Germany and Danforth Walker FRPSL from the United States. Signing the Roll of Distinguished Philatelists, founded in 1921 and first signed by King George the Fifth, is the pre-eminent philatelic honour in the world.
The Cloth Hall, the chief symbol of medieval prosperity, was severely damaged by fire caused by incendiary devices on 22nd November 1914, and by the end of the war the belfry tower dating from 1201 was a burned out ruin. Rebuilding began in 1928, and the restoration was finished in 1967.
Illustration 1.
Contemporary postcard showing the bell tower of the Cloth Hall after its destruction during 1914-1918.
Illustration 2.
The Cloth Hall today.
Patrick Maselis is a Vice-President of the Royal Philatelic Society London and President of l’Académie de Philatélie de Belgique, and together with the President of the Royal, Chris King FRPSL, they have invited members of the two societies and all interested philatelists to a philatelic meeting in Ypres, where they will jointly host the 2014 RDP ceremony, talks and displays on WWI philately, a reception at the Cloth Hall, a special ‘Last Post’ at the Menin Gate followed by a gala dinner, a battle field tour, and the closing dinner. For Chris and Patrick philately offers both an opportunity for study and an opportunity for social gatherings, where old friends and new can meet. Visitors are expected from many of the adversaries of 1914, united through an interest in philately.
It’s not just the philately or the history that stand behind this event, which is supported also by the Belgian Post, the Belgian Philatelic Study Circle, the Forces Postal History Society, the World War I and II Study Circle (Belgium), the Study Group Occupied Territories World War I (Germany) and The Philatelic Congress of Great Britain. For this occasion, the World War I and II Study Circle will publish a book in English about mail service during the Great War.
Both Chris and Patrick had grandfathers in the First World War. Bertie King (1893-1965), briefly an acting corporal, serving on the French-Belgian border, and Jérôme Maselis (1897-1937). Both were soldiers and both returned home from the fighting.
Surviving covers are unique testimonies of one of the darkest chapters in European history. They tell the stories of individual men and women, which are often missing from the history books, and speakers are invited for lectures on WWI related philately. At the same time there will be a 200 frame philatelic exhibition of material from “World War One in Northern Europe” at “Het Vleeshuis”, the Butchers’ Hall, a 13th century building opposite the Cloth Hall.
Below are a few examples of Danish and Belgian material, which will be shown at the exhibition, but with 200 frames on display there will be material from the whole of the north western part of Europe, not just of interest for postal historians, but for all disciplines from traditional to open philately.
Illustration 3.
3rd July 1914: Invitation to a memorial service for the “late Imperial and Royal Highness Archduke Franz Ferdinand” in Copenhagen.
Illustration 4.
15th March 1917: Postcard sent to Denmark marked D for Danish. Return address Ambulance de l’Ocean La Panne, Belgium.
Denmark provided a significant number of volunteer doctors and nurses, who worked in hospitals and ambulance units, mainly behind the lines on the Allied side. The Red Cross Hospital in De Panne, named L’ambulance de l’Océan, was set up in December 1914 and closed on October 15th 1919, remaining open to treat victims of the Spanish ‘flu epidemic. This hospital treated more than 24,000 wounded soldiers and was staffed by nurses from Great Britain, Canada, the United States, and Denmark.
For Patrick Maselis, one of the main attractions will be the opportunity to display a cover from the trenches around Ypres written by his grandfather. Patrick was offered this cover in 2011. He had never before seen any document in his grandfather’s hand writing, because he died in 1937, and his house was burnt to the ground in the early days of the Second World War.
Illustration 5.
25th September 1918: Envelope sent by Jérôme Maselis to The Hague in The Netherlands
The cover was sent in early 1918 from the trenches to The Netherlands. It was franked at the preferential rate of 20 centimes for The Netherlands. Since it was not addressed to a family member, free franking did not apply. The letter went from Belgium via Folkestone to The Netherlands. The censor in Folkestone opened the letter and put the oval stamp C F (Censored at Folkestone) on the cover. The CF in oval is rare and was in use only at the very end of the war.
Illustration 6.
4th August 1914: The day of the invasion
Germany invaded Belgium on 4th August 1914. All mail exchange with Germany immediately ceased. This is a cover from that day addressed from Belgium to Germany, and returned to sender, service suspended. To get mail through the enemy lines many legal and illegal routes were used. A legal route in use in 1914 and early 1915 was through the Dutch consulate in Ghent, since the Netherlands were neutral in the First World War.
The Royal Philatelic Society London and the Belgian Academy of Philately look forward to a weekend of philately with good food, good conversation, interesting philatelic research, and remembrance of the devastation that descended on Europe in a period of less than six weeks between the assassination of 28th June and 4th August 1914 when Britain, reluctantly, declared war on Germany after the invasion of neutral Belgium.
The RDP Ceremony in the Cloth Hall at Ypres will be a time for celebration of our hobby, and of the peace that we enjoy in Europe, in a building that rose again from the ashes of the First World War and from the death and destruction of 1914-1918.
All interested philatelists are welcome. If you would like to visit Ypres and participate, or for all further information, please consult the website www.rdpceremonyweekend.com or contact Patrick Maselis directly at info@maselis.be or by fax on 00 32 51 22 69 50 or by regular mail: Kaaistraat 19, 8800 Roeselare, Belgium.
https://fepanews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Ypres-invitation.jpg443665José Ramón Morenohttps://fepanews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/fepanews_logo-107x138-1.pngJosé Ramón Moreno2014-05-25 22:14:222017-11-14 10:45:01Philatelists commemorates the Centenary of the First World War
Some days ago I received from Jonas Hallstrom an e-mail with information about a meeting, which was organised in Sweden.
Reading these documents and manly the conclusions that I am sending you, I was thinking with my buttons that “Monsieur de la Palice” could not do better.
Here have you, dear reader, the Hallstrom´s document:
SUMMIT PAPER RELEASES #7 AND #8
Dear friends of philately,
Three weeks ago Malmö 3rd International Philatelic Summit was conducted with 92 participants from 20 countries. This year’s seminar content was dealing with the philatelic material in competitive exhibits representing all FIP exhibition classes. Why did the Summit deal with philatelic material?
For all exhibition classes the philatelic material is fundamental for the constitution of the exhibit. The limit of the frame space allocated at exhibitions does not allow the exhibitor to display the entire collection.
The exhibitor must select suitable philatelic material which will ensure continuity and understanding of the subject and the concept in the exhibit.
The judges’ evaluation of exhibits will only take into consideration the philatelic material and relevant information presented in the frames, which challenge the exhibitor to only select and display relevant material supporting documentation and text.
The philatelic material displayed should be fully consistent with the subject and show the appreciation of the exhibitor as to what is available. The material should include the fullest range being relevant and of the highest quality available.”
It is obvious that all exhibitors know that they must show in the exhibits:
The best philatelic material, because it is fundamental for the constitution of the exhibit.
The exhibitors know very well that must select suitable philatelic material which will ensure continuity and understanding of the subject and the concept in the exhibit.
Judges’ evaluation of exhibits will only take into consideration the philatelic material and relevant information presented in the frames.
How can be conclude this in a meeting? How could the juror classified the material that is not shown??Incredible this conclusion. Perhaps in the future the goals of Cristiano Ronaldo will also be valid after the game, when he is playing football games in his computer!!!! Is it not the same?
The philatelic material displayed should be fully consistent with the subject and show the appreciation of the exhibitor as to what is available.
Is it obvious?
So, my question and doubt is: Is it necessary to organize a meeting with 20 countries to find only these obvious conclusions?
I am sure that we had a lot of show off, typical of THE SYSTEM.
But my fundamental question is: Are they the FIP jurors prepared and able to classify the exhibits from 87 countries, the FIP members?
It is obvious that they are not. They are not supermen.
One time in Austria I was asking a juror about the classification of an exhibit of pre-adhesive Portuguese material and the answer was: Sorry I do understand nothing about this.
Another time in Essen, I was Honorary President of the Jury, in my condition of FEPA President, and in the first reading of the results I found a Portuguese exhibit of Postal History with 83 points, which was a very low classification. I was talking with the team leader and after the group and myself went together in front of the frames, where I had the opportunity to explain the entire exhibit piece by piece. I never talked in any points or any other classification. In the second reading of the results the exhibit grow up to 93 points!!
So Jonas Hallstrom we need urgently to organize various meetings not to the exhibitors, but mainly to the jurors.
We need urgently meetings to educate the jurors, how they can solve their own problems to classify philatelic material and relevant information presented in the frames, suitable philatelic material which will ensure continuity and understanding of the subject and the concept in the exhibit, The philatelic material displayed should be fully consistent with the subject, when they do not know the material!
This is the question and problem that we have many, and many times in the international exhibitions, where a lot of jurors does understand nothing about the material, which is in the frames.
I give you another example in Stationary.
The private stationary of Portugal is 1000 times rarer than the Spanish material. However in the world exhibitions the Spanish exhibits got already 95 points, nevertheless the Portuguese exhibits never won more than a large vermeil, maximum 89 points!!
Do you know why? First because the juror does not know this Portuguese material, second because normally Spain has always a juror invited to participate in the exhibition, and he is able to defend the exhibits from his country.
I could give you more examples, because in 41 years as exhibitor, director and organizer of many exhibitions, I saw many, many wrong things, but at the moment it is enough.
So Jonas Hallstrom, the problem is not only in the exhibitors, but many times in the jurors. The exhibitors must learn obvious things, like it is expressing in Hallstrom´s e-mail. Everybody know this, why to do a meeting to find these obvious conclusions???!!
It is incredible, how it is necessary to organize a meeting in Sweden, to find these obvious conclusions.
Like I said Monsieur de la Palice could not do better!
But Jonas Hallstrom, when a meeting to the jurors?? When? In this meeting they must try to discuss these kinds of problems and to solve them.
But if you do not want to do it, I have the answer.
Why to have not in all exhibitions one juror from each country, who had been nominated by the country? If the country had 3/5 exhibits it should have the right to have a juror.
If we are following this right principle, the other jurors can have a good help, when they are not able to classify an exhibit, because they do not know the material.
It is obvious Jonas Hallstrom, that if this happened in the future, we are losing games of the SYSTEM and it was not necessary to play THE SYSTEM better than the other, as you said in FEPA Congress in Opatia.
Europe must think about this, the European Federations must fight against the THE SYSTEM and never to give permission to their members to play any SYSTEM. We must defend the interests of exhibitors and National Federations.
Without jurors, we will have philately. Without philatelists, the philately will be over. So the philatelists are more important, than the jurors.
So Jonas Hallstrom, a meeting to jurors, could be a good solution to the future of the philately, looking the interests of the philatelists, or do you think that the jurors are the supreme of the philately, not needing to learn anything more?
So in the next year I hope to see organised in Sweden, a meeting to jurors!
This is the reason, because many times I do not believe in commissions and meetings, when we are seeing the obvious conclusions of this meeting held in Sweden, and when they do serve for nothing and are only show off.
It will better to spend this money in other philatelic actions.
Pedro Vaz Pereira
President of the Portuguese Philatelic Federation
https://fepanews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/fepanews_logo-107x138-1.png00Ari Muhonenhttps://fepanews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/fepanews_logo-107x138-1.pngAri Muhonen2014-05-22 11:29:142017-09-18 20:21:05Summit Paper Release
New Board for the Finnish Federation
The annual congress of the Finnish Philatelic Federation was held on April 11, 2014 in Turku as part of the Aboex National Philatelic Exhibition. As Mr. Ari Muhonen had served the maximum six years a new President had to be elected. The new President is Mr. Klaus Juvas. Two new members of the board were also elected, namely Mr. Jussi Murtosaari and Mr. Marcus Olli.
Back row from left: Heikki Peltola, Tuomas Juvonen, Marcus Olli, Klaus Juvas (President). Front row from left: Jussi Murtosaari, Petteri Hannula (Vice President), Ilkka Salonen.
Philatelists commemorates the Centenary of the First World War
As Europe prepares to commemorate the centenary of the First World War, British and Belgian Philatelists, and their guests will gather in Ypres in Belgium from Friday 11th July till Monday 14th July for lectures and an exhibition of philatelic material from the War. The Roll of Distinguished Philately will also be signed in Ypres in the Cloth Hall. This year’s signatories are Robert Johnson FRPSL and Christopher King FRPSL, both from the United Kingdom, together with Wolfgang A. Maaßen FRPSL from Germany and Danforth Walker FRPSL from the United States. Signing the Roll of Distinguished Philatelists, founded in 1921 and first signed by King George the Fifth, is the pre-eminent philatelic honour in the world.
The Cloth Hall, the chief symbol of medieval prosperity, was severely damaged by fire caused by incendiary devices on 22nd November 1914, and by the end of the war the belfry tower dating from 1201 was a burned out ruin. Rebuilding began in 1928, and the restoration was finished in 1967.
Illustration 1.
Contemporary postcard showing the bell tower of the Cloth Hall after its destruction during 1914-1918.
Illustration 2.
The Cloth Hall today.
Patrick Maselis is a Vice-President of the Royal Philatelic Society London and President of l’Académie de Philatélie de Belgique, and together with the President of the Royal, Chris King FRPSL, they have invited members of the two societies and all interested philatelists to a philatelic meeting in Ypres, where they will jointly host the 2014 RDP ceremony, talks and displays on WWI philately, a reception at the Cloth Hall, a special ‘Last Post’ at the Menin Gate followed by a gala dinner, a battle field tour, and the closing dinner. For Chris and Patrick philately offers both an opportunity for study and an opportunity for social gatherings, where old friends and new can meet. Visitors are expected from many of the adversaries of 1914, united through an interest in philately.
It’s not just the philately or the history that stand behind this event, which is supported also by the Belgian Post, the Belgian Philatelic Study Circle, the Forces Postal History Society, the World War I and II Study Circle (Belgium), the Study Group Occupied Territories World War I (Germany) and The Philatelic Congress of Great Britain. For this occasion, the World War I and II Study Circle will publish a book in English about mail service during the Great War.
Both Chris and Patrick had grandfathers in the First World War. Bertie King (1893-1965), briefly an acting corporal, serving on the French-Belgian border, and Jérôme Maselis (1897-1937). Both were soldiers and both returned home from the fighting.
Surviving covers are unique testimonies of one of the darkest chapters in European history. They tell the stories of individual men and women, which are often missing from the history books, and speakers are invited for lectures on WWI related philately. At the same time there will be a 200 frame philatelic exhibition of material from “World War One in Northern Europe” at “Het Vleeshuis”, the Butchers’ Hall, a 13th century building opposite the Cloth Hall.
Below are a few examples of Danish and Belgian material, which will be shown at the exhibition, but with 200 frames on display there will be material from the whole of the north western part of Europe, not just of interest for postal historians, but for all disciplines from traditional to open philately.
Illustration 3.
3rd July 1914: Invitation to a memorial service for the “late Imperial and Royal Highness Archduke Franz Ferdinand” in Copenhagen.
Illustration 4.
15th March 1917: Postcard sent to Denmark marked D for Danish. Return address Ambulance de l’Ocean La Panne, Belgium.
Denmark provided a significant number of volunteer doctors and nurses, who worked in hospitals and ambulance units, mainly behind the lines on the Allied side. The Red Cross Hospital in De Panne, named L’ambulance de l’Océan, was set up in December 1914 and closed on October 15th 1919, remaining open to treat victims of the Spanish ‘flu epidemic. This hospital treated more than 24,000 wounded soldiers and was staffed by nurses from Great Britain, Canada, the United States, and Denmark.
For Patrick Maselis, one of the main attractions will be the opportunity to display a cover from the trenches around Ypres written by his grandfather. Patrick was offered this cover in 2011. He had never before seen any document in his grandfather’s hand writing, because he died in 1937, and his house was burnt to the ground in the early days of the Second World War.
Illustration 5.
25th September 1918: Envelope sent by Jérôme Maselis to The Hague in The Netherlands
The cover was sent in early 1918 from the trenches to The Netherlands. It was franked at the preferential rate of 20 centimes for The Netherlands. Since it was not addressed to a family member, free franking did not apply. The letter went from Belgium via Folkestone to The Netherlands. The censor in Folkestone opened the letter and put the oval stamp C F (Censored at Folkestone) on the cover. The CF in oval is rare and was in use only at the very end of the war.
Illustration 6.
4th August 1914: The day of the invasion
Germany invaded Belgium on 4th August 1914. All mail exchange with Germany immediately ceased. This is a cover from that day addressed from Belgium to Germany, and returned to sender, service suspended. To get mail through the enemy lines many legal and illegal routes were used. A legal route in use in 1914 and early 1915 was through the Dutch consulate in Ghent, since the Netherlands were neutral in the First World War.
The Royal Philatelic Society London and the Belgian Academy of Philately look forward to a weekend of philately with good food, good conversation, interesting philatelic research, and remembrance of the devastation that descended on Europe in a period of less than six weeks between the assassination of 28th June and 4th August 1914 when Britain, reluctantly, declared war on Germany after the invasion of neutral Belgium.
The RDP Ceremony in the Cloth Hall at Ypres will be a time for celebration of our hobby, and of the peace that we enjoy in Europe, in a building that rose again from the ashes of the First World War and from the death and destruction of 1914-1918.
All interested philatelists are welcome. If you would like to visit Ypres and participate, or for all further information, please consult the website www.rdpceremonyweekend.com or contact Patrick Maselis directly at info@maselis.be or by fax on 00 32 51 22 69 50 or by regular mail: Kaaistraat 19, 8800 Roeselare, Belgium.
Summit Paper Release
Some days ago I received from Jonas Hallstrom an e-mail with information about a meeting, which was organised in Sweden.
Reading these documents and manly the conclusions that I am sending you, I was thinking with my buttons that “Monsieur de la Palice” could not do better.
Here have you, dear reader, the Hallstrom´s document:
SUMMIT PAPER RELEASES #7 AND #8
Dear friends of philately,
Three weeks ago Malmö 3rd International Philatelic Summit was conducted with 92 participants from 20 countries. This year’s seminar content was dealing with the philatelic material in competitive exhibits representing all FIP exhibition classes. Why did the Summit deal with philatelic material?
It is obvious that all exhibitors know that they must show in the exhibits:
How can be conclude this in a meeting? How could the juror classified the material that is not shown??Incredible this conclusion. Perhaps in the future the goals of Cristiano Ronaldo will also be valid after the game, when he is playing football games in his computer!!!! Is it not the same?
Is it obvious?
So, my question and doubt is: Is it necessary to organize a meeting with 20 countries to find only these obvious conclusions?
I am sure that we had a lot of show off, typical of THE SYSTEM.
But my fundamental question is: Are they the FIP jurors prepared and able to classify the exhibits from 87 countries, the FIP members?
It is obvious that they are not. They are not supermen.
One time in Austria I was asking a juror about the classification of an exhibit of pre-adhesive Portuguese material and the answer was: Sorry I do understand nothing about this.
Another time in Essen, I was Honorary President of the Jury, in my condition of FEPA President, and in the first reading of the results I found a Portuguese exhibit of Postal History with 83 points, which was a very low classification. I was talking with the team leader and after the group and myself went together in front of the frames, where I had the opportunity to explain the entire exhibit piece by piece. I never talked in any points or any other classification. In the second reading of the results the exhibit grow up to 93 points!!
So Jonas Hallstrom we need urgently to organize various meetings not to the exhibitors, but mainly to the jurors.
We need urgently meetings to educate the jurors, how they can solve their own problems to classify philatelic material and relevant information presented in the frames, suitable philatelic material which will ensure continuity and understanding of the subject and the concept in the exhibit, The philatelic material displayed should be fully consistent with the subject, when they do not know the material!
This is the question and problem that we have many, and many times in the international exhibitions, where a lot of jurors does understand nothing about the material, which is in the frames.
I give you another example in Stationary.
The private stationary of Portugal is 1000 times rarer than the Spanish material. However in the world exhibitions the Spanish exhibits got already 95 points, nevertheless the Portuguese exhibits never won more than a large vermeil, maximum 89 points!!
Do you know why? First because the juror does not know this Portuguese material, second because normally Spain has always a juror invited to participate in the exhibition, and he is able to defend the exhibits from his country.
I could give you more examples, because in 41 years as exhibitor, director and organizer of many exhibitions, I saw many, many wrong things, but at the moment it is enough.
So Jonas Hallstrom, the problem is not only in the exhibitors, but many times in the jurors. The exhibitors must learn obvious things, like it is expressing in Hallstrom´s e-mail. Everybody know this, why to do a meeting to find these obvious conclusions???!!
It is incredible, how it is necessary to organize a meeting in Sweden, to find these obvious conclusions.
Like I said Monsieur de la Palice could not do better!
But Jonas Hallstrom, when a meeting to the jurors?? When? In this meeting they must try to discuss these kinds of problems and to solve them.
But if you do not want to do it, I have the answer.
Why to have not in all exhibitions one juror from each country, who had been nominated by the country? If the country had 3/5 exhibits it should have the right to have a juror.
If we are following this right principle, the other jurors can have a good help, when they are not able to classify an exhibit, because they do not know the material.
It is obvious Jonas Hallstrom, that if this happened in the future, we are losing games of the SYSTEM and it was not necessary to play THE SYSTEM better than the other, as you said in FEPA Congress in Opatia.
Europe must think about this, the European Federations must fight against the THE SYSTEM and never to give permission to their members to play any SYSTEM. We must defend the interests of exhibitors and National Federations.
Without jurors, we will have philately. Without philatelists, the philately will be over. So the philatelists are more important, than the jurors.
So Jonas Hallstrom, a meeting to jurors, could be a good solution to the future of the philately, looking the interests of the philatelists, or do you think that the jurors are the supreme of the philately, not needing to learn anything more?
So in the next year I hope to see organised in Sweden, a meeting to jurors!
This is the reason, because many times I do not believe in commissions and meetings, when we are seeing the obvious conclusions of this meeting held in Sweden, and when they do serve for nothing and are only show off.
It will better to spend this money in other philatelic actions.
Pedro Vaz Pereira
President of the Portuguese Philatelic Federation